← Back to research
Late-stage private markets · Secondaries

The Physical Layer

For professional and institutional readers
27 July 2026
  • Saronic, an autonomous-warship maker founded in 2022, was marked at $9.25bn on 31 March 2026 — 2.3× the $4bn it carried thirteen months earlier.
  • The cohort raised more than $5bn of primary capital in the eighteen months to June 2026. Isomorphic Labs alone took $2.1bn in May; Saronic $1.75bn in March.
  • Marks span from ≈$0.5bn at Precision Neuroscience to $9.25bn at Saronic — across the selected defence, robotics, photonics, nuclear energy, neurotechnology and drug design companies.
  • Almost none of the cohort has meaningful revenue. Price rests on the size of the prize rather than on cash flow — the same logic visible one tier up, where Anduril was marked at $61bn in May on ≈$2.2bn of 2025 revenue, or about 28× sales.
  • Three names — Isomorphic, Synchron and Panthalassa — were funded without a cleanly priced post-money. In deep tech, price is increasingly discovered through round size and the identity of the backer as much as through a stated mark.
  • On 12 June, SpaceX became the first company of this type to be priced by a public market, listing at $135 a share for an implied $1.77tn. It has since traded below its offer price. The marks in this note have not yet faced that test.

The ranking

Ranked by the most recently disclosed private valuation, the cohort is led by a company that did not exist five years ago. Saronic, which builds autonomous surface vessels for the US Navy, closed a $1.75bn Series D at $9.25bn at the end of March — more than double the ≈$4bn it carried a year earlier. Physical Intelligence, a robot-foundation-model lab, follows at $5.6bn; Lightmatter, in silicon photonics, at $4.4bn. Below them the marks thin quickly. Physical Intelligence’s figure may already be stale: Bloomberg reported in March that the company was in talks to raise about $1bn at more than $11bn, and no close had been announced as at the date of this note. We rank on what has printed, not on what is being discussed.

Three businesses — Isomorphic Labs, Synchron and Panthalassa — have raised substantial capital without a cleanly disclosed post-money. The distinction matters more than it sounds. A priced round fixes a number that every subsequent holder, auditor and buyer can reference; a large cheque from a well-known name signals conviction but leaves the number itself unfixed. We treat the two differently throughout.

$0 $2bn $4bn $6bn $8bn $10bn Saronic $9.25bn Physical Intelligence $5.6bn Lightmatter $4.4bn Radiant $1.8bn Synchron $1bn Panthalassa $1bn Precision Neuro $500m
Latest disclosed private valuation, US$. Radiant reported at more than $1.8bn. Synchron’s ≈$1bn is company-stated; Panthalassa’s ≈$1bn is press-reported (Financial Times, citing a person familiar with the terms). Neither is a cleanly priced round. Isomorphic Labs raised $2.1bn in May with no disclosed mark and is omitted. Figures rounded.
CompanyValuationDomainLatest markCapital raised
Saronic$9.25bnDefence & maritime$1.75bn Series D · Mar 2026≈$2.58bn
Physical Intelligence$5.6bnRobotics$600m Series B · Nov 2025≈$1.07bn
Lightmatter$4.4bnPhotonics$400m Series D · Oct 2024$850m
Radiant≈$1.8bnNuclear energy$300m+ Series D · Dec 2025≈$525m
Synchron≈$1bnNeurotechnology$200m Series D · Nov 2025$345m
Panthalassa≈$1bnOcean compute$140m Series B · May 2026≈$185m
Precision Neuroscience≈$0.5bnNeurotechnology$102m Series C · Dec 2024$155m
Isomorphic LabsNot disclosedAI drug design$2.1bn round · May 2026≈$2.7bn
Valuations from public reporting of funding rounds. “Not disclosed” denotes a round announced without a stated post-money. Capital raised is cumulative primary capital, as reported. Figures rounded.

Capital into the frontier

The flow of primary capital is heavier than the marks alone suggest. Isomorphic Labs, the Alphabet-backed drug-design business spun out of DeepMind, raised $2.1bn in May without naming a valuation — the single largest cheque in the cohort. Saronic’s $1.75bn is the second. After those two, round sizes fall to the low hundreds of millions. The concentration of capital mirrors the concentration of marks: a short head and a long tail. Two companies took three-quarters of the money.

$0 $500m $1bn $1.5bn $2bn Isomorphic Labs $2.1bn Saronic $1.75bn Physical Intelligence $600m Lightmatter $400m Radiant $300m Synchron $200m Panthalassa $140m Precision Neuro $102m
Size of most recently disclosed primary round, US$. Lightmatter’s figure is its October 2024 Series D; all others fall within the past eighteen months. Figures rounded.

Grouped by domain, life sciences and defence absorb roughly three-quarters of the eighteen-month total. Robotics, energy, neurotechnology and ocean compute share the remainder. The breadth of the “AI meets atoms” story is real, but the money is not evenly spread.

$5.2bn RAISED, 18M Life sciences $2.1bn · 40% Defence & maritime $1.75bn · 34% Robotics $600m · 12% Neurotechnology $302m · 6% Energy $300m · 6% Ocean compute $140m · 3%
Share of primary capital raised across the cohort in the eighteen months to June 2026, by domain. Neurotechnology combines Synchron and Precision Neuroscience. Lightmatter’s October 2024 round sits outside the window. Shares are rounded and may not sum to 100.

The scale

Plotted against the capital each has consumed, the marks show what is actually being underwritten. There is no revenue line to anchor these valuations, because the businesses are pre-commercial. What the chart shows instead is a money-in multiple — the mark divided by every dollar the company has ever raised. It is a crude measure, but it is the only one available when there are no sales to divide by, and it says something useful: how much value the market is assigning above the cost of the assets and the team assembled so far.

The multiples cluster tightly. Synchron sits at roughly 2.9× money-in, Precision Neuroscience 3.2×, Radiant 3.4× and Saronic 3.6×; Lightmatter and Physical Intelligence both around 5.2×, and Panthalassa 5.4×. A cohort spanning warships, reactors, surgical implants and photonic chips is being priced within a band of roughly three to five and a half times capital consumed. That consistency is itself the finding: investors are not underwriting seven different businesses so much as one recurring bet.

What that bet looks like when it matures is visible one tier up. Anduril, the same thesis a decade older, was marked at $61bn in May on roughly $2.2bn of 2025 revenue — about 28× sales, against the 1.6× to 2.7× at which the listed defence primes trade. The frontier is being priced today on the business that Anduril became. Whether the next tier gets there is the open question.

$0 $2bn $4bn $6bn $8bn $10bn $0 $0.5bn $1bn $1.5bn $2bn $2.5bn $3bn Total primary capital raised (US$bn) Latest disclosed mark (US$bn) Saronic Phys. Intelligence Lightmatter Radiant Synchron Panthalassa Precision
Latest disclosed mark against cumulative primary capital raised, US$. Marks run between roughly 2.9× and 5.4× money-in across the cohort. These are pre-revenue businesses; the mark rests on the size of the prize, not on cash flow. Saronic highlighted. Figures rounded.

What the desk is watching

Three observations:

  1. None of these businesses is yet valued on revenue, so each mark is a claim about execution that has not happened yet.
    • Isomorphic holds partnerships with Eli Lilly, Novartis and Johnson & Johnson worth close to $3bn in potential milestones, yet no patient had been dosed with a drug it designed as at May 2026, and first-in-human trials have already slipped from end-2025 to end-2026.
    • Saronic says it will be able to build around twenty of its 180-foot Marauder vessels in 2027 at full capacity, and in July selected Brownsville, Texas for Port Alpha, a $3bn shipyard due to open in 2028.
    • Radiant took delivery of its first tranche of TRISO fuel at Idaho National Laboratory on 1 July, but its Kaleidos reactor did not reach criticality by the federal 4 July target and its five-phase test campaign now runs through the summer.
    • Precision Neuroscience is the one name with a cleared, saleable product, and it carries the smallest mark in the cohort. Delivery and price are not yet moving together.
  2. Atoms are heavier than software. The gap between a financing and a shipped product is longer, and the capital required to cross it is larger. A cohort raising at this pace is a cohort that will need to keep raising, which makes each of these marks a bet on the availability of the next round as much as on the technology.
  3. Isomorphic, Synchron and Panthalassa were each funded without a clean post-money. A large cheque from a marquee backer is a strong signal, but it is not a priced valuation, and we flag the distinction wherever it applies.

Sources

  1. Saronic — $1.75bn Series D at $9.25bn post-money, led by Kleiner Perkins; prior $600m Series C at $4bn, Feb 2025; cumulative primary capital ≈$2.58bn. PR Newswire, Sullivan & Cromwell, CNBC; 31 Mar 2026.
  2. Saronic — Port Alpha, a $3bn shipyard at the Port of Brownsville, Texas; construction from 2026, opening targeted 2028. Around twenty Marauder vessels a year at full capacity in 2027 per CEO Dino Mavrookas. Naval News, gCaptain, Tectonic; 16 Jul 2026 and 9 Dec 2025.
  3. Physical Intelligence — $600m Series B at $5.6bn, led by CapitalG; Series A $400m at $2.4bn, Nov 2024; cumulative ≈$1.07bn. Reported in talks for ≈$1bn at more than $11bn (Mar 2026), not announced as closed. Bloomberg; 20 Nov 2025 and 27 Mar 2026.
  4. Lightmatter — $400m Series D at $4.4bn, led by investors advised by T. Rowe Price; total raised $850m. BusinessWire, Bloomberg; 16 Oct 2024.
  5. Radiant — Series D of more than $300m, led by Draper Associates and Boost VC, valuing the company at more than $1.8bn; cumulative ≈$525m. First TRISO fuel delivered to the DOME facility at Idaho National Laboratory, 1 Jul 2026; criticality not achieved by the 4 Jul 2026 federal target. Bloomberg, TechCrunch, World Nuclear News, American Nuclear Society; 17 Dec 2025 to 22 Jul 2026.
  6. Synchron — $200m Series D led by Double Point Ventures; total $345m; valuation stated by a company spokesperson as “nearly $1bn”. BusinessWire, Bloomberg, FierceBiotech; 6 Nov 2025.
  7. Panthalassa — $140m Series B led by Peter Thiel; wave-powered offshore AI compute; valuation of close to $1bn reported by the Financial Times citing a person familiar with the terms. BusinessWire, Fortune, GeekWire; 4–14 May 2026.
  8. Precision Neuroscience — $102m Series C led by General Equity Holdings; total $155m; post-money reported at ≈$500m. FDA 510(k) clearance for the Layer 7 Cortical Interface, Apr 2025. GlobeNewswire, MobiHealthNews, MedTech Dive; 16 Dec 2024 and 17 Apr 2025.
  9. Isomorphic Labs — $2.1bn Series B led by Thrive Capital, with Alphabet, GV, MGX, Temasek, CapitalG and the UK Sovereign AI Fund; no disclosed post-money; first external round $600m, Mar 2025; cumulative ≈$2.7bn. Lilly and Novartis collaborations carry up to ≈$2.9bn in potential milestones; Johnson & Johnson subsequently added. First-in-human trials guided to end-2026, revised from end-2025. Isomorphic Labs, PR Newswire, Bloomberg, FierceBiotech, TechCrunch; 12 May 2026.
  10. Anduril — $5bn Series H at $61bn, co-led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz; 2025 revenue ≈$2.2bn per CEO letter to investors; cumulative funding more than $11bn. TechCrunch, Bloomberg, Forbes; 13 May 2026.
  11. SpaceX — Nasdaq listing (SPCX) on 12 Jun 2026; 555.6m shares at $135, raising ≈$75bn for an implied ≈$1.77tn; opened at $150; high of $225.64 on 16 Jun; closed below the offer price from 15 Jul; ≈$114 a share and ≈$1.5tn market capitalisation on 24 Jul 2026. CNBC, Nasdaq, Forbes, Quartz, stockanalysis.com; 11 Jun to 24 Jul 2026.
  12. Full note and methodology: piecapitalpartners.com/research/the-physical-layer. Published as independent research for professional and institutional readers.
This document is published by Pie Capital Partners as independent research for professional and institutional readers. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or interest. Pie Capital Partners is not an investment adviser, broker-dealer, placement agent, or fiduciary, and does not arrange, intermediate, or settle transactions. All information is drawn from publicly available sources believed to be reliable; no representation is made as to accuracy, completeness, or currency. The reader is responsible for independent verification and for any decisions taken. © Pie Capital Partners.
Pie Capital PartnersThe Physical Layer · 27 July 2026